This BLOG deals with current US immigration issues:

Saturday, May 28, 2005

The REAL ID Act of 2005 (H.R.1268)

April 27-2005:

As your constituent, I am writing to urge you to make sure that the REAL ID Act of 2005, an anti-refugee bill, is not attached to the emergency spending bill on Iraq and tsunami aid (H.R.1268). It is a complex bill that should be duly considered, not pushed through hastily.

Dear Senator;
As your constituent, I am writing to urge you to make sure that the REAL ID Act of 2005, an anti-refugee bill, is not attached to the emergency spending bill on Iraq and tsunami aid (H.R.1268). It is a complex bill that should be duly considered, not pushed through hastily.

I am glad that the Senate has chosen not to attach REAL ID to its version of the supplemental appropriations bill, and now I hope you will do all you can to make sure that REAL ID is not attached in conference.

I wish to express particular concern about sections 101, 103, and 104 of the bill. Section 101 is titled, “Preventing Terrorists from Obtaining Relief From Removal,” but that makes no sense to me. Terrorists and suspected terrorists are already categorically barred from asylum, as you know, and this bill would not actually protect me, you, or any other Americans from terrorists.

Instead it would place burdens on asylum-seekers that would likely fall hardest on the most vulnerable among them, such as women who have been victims of gender-based persecution. How can a woman who was raped show that her ethnicity, or her religion, was “a central reason” for her persecution? Similarly, the most frightened and traumatized asylum-seekers may be just the ones whose “demeanor” does not strike a judge as credible, since torture survivors often recount their sufferings without apparent emotion.

Section 101 would also increase the burden of proof for some asylum applicants, by allowing judges to require supplemental evidence, and to deny asylum if it isn’t provided. Obtaining such evidence can be difficult for refugees who often flee without their belongings, and who are often put into detention after they arrive here. Finally, asking their family or friends back home to collect the evidence often puts them in danger.

I am also worried that immigrants, including asylum-seekers and asylees, could be wrongfully deported under the extremely broad definitions of terrorist activity in Sections 103 and 104.

The definition of terrorist organizations includes a “group of two or more, whether organized or not” or a subgroup of such a group that is involved in vaguely defined terrorist activities. And section 103 would create an impossibly high standard, requiring immigrants to prove by “clear and convincing evidence” that they did not know that an organization with which they had some association was involved in broadly defined terrorist activities.

This is a virtually impossible level of proof because it would require a person to prove what they did not know, so immigrants would be unable to defend themselves against a mistaken accusation.

Section 103 also penalizes people for espousing or endorsing terrorist activity. This broad language extends beyond conduct and has the potential to infringe on a person’s freedom of speech. To verbally endorse an activity is currently well permitted in the Constitution of the United States. The bill in its current form imposes dangerous penalties on freedom of speech in this country.

I hope that you will consider my concerns as the Senate negotiates with the House on whether to include REAL ID in the supplemental spending bill.

Sincerely,

Derryck S. Griffith.Political Educator & Advocate.http://profiles.yahoo.com/derryckgrifith

Legal Path For Immigrants:

LEGAL PATH FOR IMMIGRANTS:

McCain, Kennedy unveil sweeping reform bill Billy HouseRepublic Washington BureauMay. 13, 2005 12:00 AM

WASHINGTON - Millions of undocumented workers in the United States could come out of the shadows by registering with the government and paying fines or fees of at least $2,000 to begin earning permanent residency under the most sweeping immigration-reform bill in two decades.

The bill introduced Thursday was dubbed the "Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act" by its bipartisan group of sponsors, led by Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Edward Kennedy, D-Mass. It would create a temporary-work visa program for foreigners to fill jobs requiring few or no skills, for up to six years.

The legislation was touted as ensuring tougher enforcement of laws at the border and in the workplace while speeding the process of reuniting immigrant families. In addition, Mexico and other countries would be encouraged to enter into agreements to play a more active role in helping prevent illegal immigration into the United States, including promoting more economic opportunity back home.

House sponsors Jim Kolbe and Jeff Flake, both Arizona Republicans, and Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill., joined McCain and Kennedy on Thursday in casting the legislation as a comprehensive approach to immigration reform and national security. They also said they believe it is consistent with the broad principles that President Bush said he'd favor in a temporary-worker plan to "match willing employers and willing workers" from other countries. In fact, Bush has offered few specifics for what he wants in such a proposal.

Immigrant advocates and some business groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said they welcomed the measure as a broad approach to immigration reform that goes beyond the piecemeal efforts of the past. But the legislation faces an uncertain future because of stiff opposition from groups that want tighter immigration controls - including many Republicans who hold a majority in the U.S. House - and that oppose giving legal status to people who've entered the country illegally.

There is, however, widespread recognition in Congress that the current immigration system is broken, despite disagreement over priorities. "I want an immigration system that says we're not going to look for people who come to mow our lawns, and wash our dishes and clean our babies' behinds and raise them. Those aren't the people we're concerned about," Gutierrez said. "We're concerned about drug dealers and smugglers on our borders."

But Arizona Republican Rep. J.D. Hayworth, who supports tighter controls on immigration, criticized the bill as a "bad idea not only because it creates a transparent path to amnesty, but also because it would reduce work opportunities, depress wages and lower worker protections for Americans." "I believe that when the disturbing details of this proposal are considered, Congress will see the light and join the overwhelming majority of Americans that want the federal government to enforce our present laws against illegal immigration," Hayworth said.

Bush administration spokesman Taylor Gross on Thursday offered no clue as to how the new bill was being received at the White House. "The president is glad to see this contribution to the discussion on immigration," Gross said, though he added, "We understand a number of other members are working on proposals, as well, and we look forward to working with members of both parties to pass a bill that meets the president's principles."

McCain assured that the measure "is not, I repeat, NOT, an amnesty bill," noting that, "The reality is there is an estimated 10 (million) to 11 million undocumented people living and working in this country. It would be impossible to identify and round them up and send them back to the countries from which they came." Insisted Kennedy: "This bill does not provide a free pass to anyone. This bill does not put those who have been illegally here in the
United States at the front of the line."

The legislation aims to enable undocumented workers to come forward to apply for one of two new visas - called an H-5B - for work status as a "non-immigrant." Under this visa, they could not only work in the United States for up to six years, but also could travel abroad. To obtain this status, workers would have to submit to fingerprinting and other background checks, pay processing fees, back taxes and a $1,000 initial fine. The worker's spouse and children also could apply.

After six years, the worker would be limited to five more years to make it through the waiting list for a green card. To eventually apply for this permanent resident status, the worker also would have to pay an additional $1,000 fine, undergo more criminal checks and a medical exam, register for selective service, and work to become proficient in English. The spouse and children also could apply for permanent status.

The bill also would create a new temporary visa to allow foreign workers to enter the country, dubbed a H-5A visa. All applicants would have to show they had a job waiting for them and pay a fee of $500, in addition to clearing all security, medical and other checks. These visas would be "portable" to other jobs, and the total number of applicants initially would be capped at 400,000 annually.

Employers who apply for foreign workers would first have to advertise those jobs on a national electronic database and give priority to U.S. workers.
Under the bill, a new visa document would be tamper-proof and include biometric information. The system would allow employers to verify electronically that a foreign worker is in the country legally and authorized to work. Any employer who participates in the program would be required to use this system; the measure would bring stiff fines on employers knowingly violating immigration labor laws.

It also calls for a commission that would evaluate the impact of the legislation on the U.S. labor market "We need a plan that fairly balances national security, economic reality and worker protections, and I think our bill comes pretty darn close," Flake said.

Added Kolbe: "This is a comprehensive bill that doesn't try to solve the hemorrhaging immigration problem with a Band-Aid. This is major surgery." McCain said he was optimistic that the Bush administration would work with lawmakers on the immigration proposal and that there would be hearings on it this year. There was no immediate reaction from Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., who with Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, is expected to introduce his own bill by the end of the summer to make it easier for foreigners to work in the United States temporarily. But they oppose making it easier for those who already are in the country illegally to gain permanent residence.

Frank Sharry, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, an immigrant advocacy group, said, "This bill will reconcile the fact that we have hardworking immigrants already here and coming in the future, but insufficient legal channels. "This bill gets the combination of admissions and enforcement just about right. In contrast to the status quo, it will mean honest admissions policies, tightly enforced," he said. Randal Johnson, the U.S.

Chamber of Commerce's vice president of labor, immigration and employee benefits, said the nation's immigration and visa policy "must improve our nation's security, address future labor shortages through a temporary-worker program and provide a reasonable mechanism for undocumented workers already here to qualify for legal status."

"While some significant issues remain to be resolved, this legislation meets those principles," he said. But Jack Martin, special projects director for the Federation for American Immigration Reform, a group that advocates improved border security to stop illegal immigration, said, "There's an amnesty component to this, whether they want to call it that or not."

END.
Reach the reporter at billy.house@arizoanrepublic.com or at 1-(202)-906-8136.

Hilary Clinton against Illegal Immigration:


Hillary Clinton Against Illegal Immigration?
Dec. 14-2004:

Sen. Hillary Clinton is seemingly taking a hard-line against illegal immigration and is being lauded by Conservatives for the position. The Washington Times yesterday cited at least two instances in recent weeks, when the New York Senator has stated her tough stance on the issue.

These reportedly include an interview last month on Fox News last month when Clinton said she does not "think that we have protected our borders or our ports or provided our first responders with the resources they need, so we can do more and we can do better." And in an interview on WABC radio, she said, "I am, you know, adamantly against illegal immigrants," according to the Washington Times.

"Clearly, we have to make some tough decisions as a country, and one of them ought to be coming up with a much better entry-and-exit system so that if we're going to let people in for the work that otherwise would not be done, let's have a system that keeps track of them," the paper quoted her as adding.

Rep. Tom Tancredo, a conservative Colorado Republican, who has been a staunch backer of tighter immigration policies, has taken notice. "She's not a dumb woman," Tancredo spokesman Carlos Espinoza told the Times. "She's got a great liberal base, and she realizes there's no better way to draw in more conservative voters. She has really come out to the forefront on that."

Meanwhile, in a statement on the passage of The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, Clinton stated, “While I look forward to a productive debate on immigration issues in the next Congress, I am pleased that there are a number of key immigration reform provisions in this legislation, including those addressing the process of obtaining U.S. visas.”

The move is being viewed by Conservatives as a welcome ploy to pull in more voters from Republican states, should she run for President in 2008.

END:
Hardbeatnews.com





Are You Preparing To Visit Guyana?

To:Guyanese@yahoogroups.com

Date:Sat, 22 Nov 2003 17:30:23 -0000Subject:[Guyanese] Visiting Guyana?

Check out The U.S. Department of StateBureau of Consular AffairsWashington, DC 20520Consular Information Sheet
This information is current as of today, Fri Nov 21-12:18:06 2003. Guyana

ENTRY/EXIT REQUIREMENTS:
A valid U.S. passport is required for U.S. citizens to enter and depart Guyana. On arrival in Guyana, visitors are granted a 30-day stay. Extensions of stay may be obtained from the Ministry of Home Affairs at 60 Brickdam Street, Georgetown. The Central Office of Immigration located on Camp Street, Georgetown, must then note the extension in the visitor's passport.Travelers for other than tourism purposes should check with the Ministry of Home Affairs for information about requirements for work permits and extended stays.

U.S.-Guyanese dual nationals departing Guyana for the U.S. under a Guyanese passport must present to Guyanese authorities a U.S. Certificate of Naturalization or similar document establishing that they may freely enter the United States.

In an effort to prevent international child abduction, many governments have initiated procedures at entry/exit points. These often include requiring documentary evidence of relationship and permission for the child's travel from the parent(s) or legal guardian not present.

Having such documentation on hand, even if not required, may facilitate entry/departure. For further information about entry, exit and custom requirements, travelers may consult the Embassy of Guyana at 2490 Tracy Place, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20008, telephone (202) 625-6900, the Consulate General in New York, or honorary consuls in California, Florida, Ohio and Texas.
Internet: http://www.guyanaca.com or http://www.guyana.org;
or email: guyanaembassy@hotmail.com.

A Comprehensive Immigration Law/Bill is needed in the USA:

SOLUTIONS:

What this country need is A Comprehensive Immigration Bill that guarantees the following:

1. Acceptance of any foreigner, who is not a security/national threat to the country, and has satisfied the Legal Immigration entry requirements.

2. Grant residence status to those who have satisfied the above requirements: Displayed respect for our national constitution & local laws: And have not committed any felonious act/s while in residence here.

3. Grant Legal Residence Status to those who have overstayed their visas, and are unable to return to their homeland, for fear of reprisals, retribution, and/or financial inability to re-enter the USA.

4. Seeking asylum for political, religious, or racial/ethnic reasons, should be considered eligible for legal residence status.

5. Any person/s who have tested HIV positive while living in the USA: Have entered the country legally: Have been residing here for over one year prior to being tested HIV positive, should be granted legal residence status, on humanitarian grounds.

6. Ensuring that our national borders are adequately policed: Persons entering or leaving our sovereign territories, must provide the necessary legal papers or identity.

7. All immigrants, legal or illegal must be allowed to access medical/emergency assistance from any hospital or clinic in The USA, without being asked for his/her legal residence status documents. Om Shanti.Derryck S.
Griffith.Political Educator & Advocate.
http://profiles.yahoo.com/derryckgrifith

The Bill Clinton Foundation:

May 27-2005.

The Clinton Foundation:

Even though I admire the efforts that former president Bill Clinton is doing for humanity lately, I still cannot ignore the time when thousands were dying en-mass in Rwanda and the United States did not intervene to end the mass slaughter there. That was under his watch!

When AIDS was ravishing millions in the continent of Africa, Bill Clinton did not aggressively inject money or medication to help alleviate the pain, suffering and death of those desperately poor and undeveloped states in Africa, that was reeking under this pandemic.

It was under his watch that The Immigration Laws that were introduced in 1996-97 that inhibited legal residence, eg P.R.U.C.O.L. (Persons Residing Under Color Of Law): Many of whom for various reasons, overstayed their time here in America, and was now seeking permanent resident status. His signing of that law, debarred most of them from ever gaining that legal status without having to return to their home countries, and risk death, poverty, shame or worse!

The only eligible people that manage to float in, sail in, drop in, or reach the shores of America, are the Cubans, and they are entitled to Automatic Legal Residence Status? This kind of differential treatment of humans, coupled with political convenience, bothers me greatly.

And I wonder if it is only after Bill Clinton left the White House, that he became human again!

Om Shanti.
Derryck S. Griffith.
Political Educator & Advocate.
http://profiles.yahoo.com/mimbari2003

Monday, May 09, 2005

Interview with Mullah Omar-Afghanistan

The Taliban's Mullah Omar - in his own words
This 12-minute interview with Mullah Omar Mohammad, the Taliban leader, was conducted in Pashtu for the publicly-funded radio channel Voice of America. The broadcast was pulled on Friday, September 21, 2001 following objections from the US Deputy Secretary Of State and senior officials of the National Security Council.

Voice of America interviewer: Why don't you expel Osama Bin Laden?
Omar: This is not an issue of Osama bin Laden. It is an issue of Islam. Islam's prestige is at stake. So is Afghanistan's tradition.

VOA: Do you know that the US has announced a war on terrorism?
Omar: I am considering two promises. One is the promise of God, the other is that of Bush. The promise of God is that my land is vast. If you start a journey on God's path, you can reside anywhere on this earth and will be protected... The promise of Bush is that there is no place on earth where you can hide that I cannot find you. We will see which one of these two promises is fulfilled.

VOA: But aren't you afraid for the people, yourself, the Taliban, your country?
Omar: Almighty God... is helping the believers and the Muslims. God says he will never be satisfied with the infidels. In terms of worldly affairs, America is very strong. Even if it were twice as strong or twice that, it could not be strong enough to defeat us. We are confident that no one can harm us if God is with us.

VOA: You are telling me you are not concerned, but Afghans all over the world are concerned.
Omar: We are also concerned. Great issues lie ahead. But we depend on God's mercy. Consider our point of view: if we give Osama away today, Muslims who are now pleading to give him up would then be reviling us for giving him up... Everyone is afraid of America and wants to please it. But Americans will not be able to prevent such acts like the one that has just occurred because America has taken Islam hostage. If you look at Islamic countries, the people are in despair. They are complaining that Islam is gone. But people remain firm in their Islamic beliefs. In their pain and frustration, some of them commit suicide acts. They feel they have nothing to lose.

VOA: What do you mean by saying America has taken the Islamic world hostage?
Omar: America controls the governments of the Islamic countries. The people ask to follow Islam, but the governments do not listen because they are in the grip of the United States. If someone follows the path of Islam, the government arrests him, tortures him or kills him. This is the doing of America. If it stops supporting those governments and lets the people deal with them, then such things won't happen. America has created the evil that is attacking it. The evil will not disappear even if I die and Osama dies and others die. The US should step back and review its policy. It should stop trying to impose its empire on the rest of the world, especially on Islamic countries.

VOA: So you won't give Osama bin Laden up?
Omar: No. We cannot do that. If we did, it means we are not Muslims... that Islam is finished. If we were afraid of attack, we could have surrendered him the last time we were threatened and attacked. So America can hit us again, and this time we don't even have a friend.

VOA: If you fight America with all your might - can the Taliban do that? Won't America beat you and won't your people suffer even more?
Omar: I'm very confident that it won't turn out this way. Please note this: there is nothing more we can do except depend on almighty God. If a person does, then he is assured that the Almighty will help him, have mercy on him and he will succeed.

END.
Derryck S. Griffith.Political Educator & Advocate.http://profiles.yahoo.com/derryckgrifith

Thursday, May 05, 2005

The Things that Matter.

The Things that Matter.

 

Are we movie
compatible?
My Flixster
profile
Find Elected Officials
Enter ZIP Code:

or Search by State

See Issues & Action
Select An Issue Area:


Contact The Media
Enter ZIP Code:

or Search by State

http://internationalpoliticalissues.blogspot.com/ http://thethingsthatmatter.blogspot.com/ http://www.myspace.com/derryck_mimbari http://blog.myspace.com/derryck_mimbari http://www.hoverspot.com/derryckgriffith http://www.mybootyspace.com/Derryck/ http://www.hoverspot.com/ http//www.derryck-mimbari http://www.tagged.com/derryck_g http://xuqa.com/426595 http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.ListAll&friendID=138631059&MyToken=c0e53780-bd7a-460d-bffa-74529bcb64dfML